TABLE 2

Smartphone sleep-tracking applications vs conventional methods of evaluating sleep

AppComparatorNStudy populationResults
Sleep Time18Polysomnography20Volunteers with no sleep disorders
Mean age 39.5
Sensitivity for sleep 89.9%
Specificity for wakefulness 50%
No clear correlation between Sleep Time and polysomnography for sleep onset latency and sleep stages
Did not awaken subjects exclusively from light sleep
Motion X 24/717Polysomnography and actigraphy64Children, adolescents with suspected obstructive sleep apnea
Mean age 8.4
Overestimated total sleep time and sleep efficiency
Underestimated sleep onset latency and wake time after sleep onset
Toss ā€˜N’ Turn19Pittsburgh Sleep
Quality Index (sleep diary)
27Volunteers
Mean age 34
Reasonable accuracy for classifying good and poor sleepers per diary
No clear correlation between app and diary for bedtime, wake time, and sleep duration